The training and experience in the background of any personal injury attorney could furnish him/her with noteworthy resources. Those same resources could serve to strengthen the attorney’s arguments, during the pre-settlement negotiations.
Actions that highlight lawyers’ training and experience
Trained to assess the worth of a given case: Lawyers make use of that training when consulting with a potential client. Experienced with process used for creation of effective demand letter: Could help client to present a reasonable demand.
Personal Injury Lawyers in Pickering know that experienced with studying the nature and position of damage on the client’s vehicle: Those details could work to strengthen or weaken the client’s case. Understands how to gather supporting documents, such as the police report and the medical report
Situations that could highlight the useful nature of a lawyer’s experience and training
A situation in which the claimant has not received a response to a demand, or a counter-demand
—A lawyer could contact the Claims Department and seek an explanation.
—If promised a response by a given date, could be ready to take action, in the event that there was no response on that same date
—Would know how to determine whether or not the insurance company had displayed evidence of bad faith
A situation in which the claimant has been charged with shared blame for a given accident
—An adjuster’s charge of shared blame should not be accepted in the absence of verifiable evidence. A personal injury lawyer would have the ability to demand the introduction of such evidence.
—The act of making such a demand could weaken the adjuster’s argument; that should limit the size of any reductions that might be made in the size of the client’s reward.
A situation in which an attorney’s client has developed slow-to-emerge symptoms: An experienced lawyer should have access to medical experts, who could explain the scientific reason for the slow emergence of certain symptoms. That should help to verify the existence of a link between the late-appearing symptoms and the accident in which the client has been involved.
A situation in which the adjuster has claimed that the victim should have been wearing some type of protective device, due to the nature of the victim’s medical history:
—An adjuster might make that claim, if the victim had a pre-existing condition.
—An experienced lawyer ought to be able to challenge the adjuster, by introducing a statement from a medical expert. That statement might demonstrate the weak nature of the adjuster’s argument.
Each of the above situations helps to illustrate the extent to which an attorney’s training and experience should provide him or her with access to valuable resources. The attorney’s clients could benefit from the same resources.
